Skip to content

Your Papers, Please…

June 3, 2013

For several years, I’ve thought that we should computerize immigration to a massive level, and then open the boarders up to anyone who wants to come in, provided they have the right papers on them 24/7.  It’s would be an easy way to track all the people in the system, and we’d get the additional fun of all police asking everyone they stop, “Are you a US Citizen, and may I see your papers, please?”

Heh.  Of course, it’s mightily unworkable, and somewhat creepy.  That would never happen here, or would it?  J.D. Tuccille wonders the same:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection insists (PDF) that “[a]ll Border Patrol checkpoints operate in accordance with the Constitution of the United States and governing judicial rulings,” and they’re correct, if you leave room for interpretation and some vigorous wiggling. The Supreme Court has ruled, in cases including United States v. Montoya de Hernandez, that “[a]utomotive travelers may be stopped at fixed checkpoints near the border without individualized suspicion, even if the stop is based largely on ethnicity.” The executive branch has interpreted “near” to mean “100 miles” which, I guess, is near enough if you work on a sufficiently large cartographic scale.

A hundred miles is a pretty big swath, if you count the coastlines.  Tuccille says that ACLU data puts about 2/3 of the population in that range.  He supposes that maybe we should all start carrying our passports in that area as a result.  Honestly… I have mine with me nearly all the time.  It sits in my computer bag as an alternate form of ID for a guy who is often on the road. (I’d note that I have other forms of government ID, but that showing a concealed carry permit to a TSA agent with a low sense of humor is not a way to make your flight… I try it occasionally when I have time just to see.)

And to the point, other than the fact that passports are a reasonable pain to get and can be costly, why wouldn’t we carry US citizenship proof everywhere?  Sure, it’d be easier if they fit in a wallet, but I have few problems with needing to prove that I’m a legal resident.  I have no particular beef with anyone here legally, and I get to deal with a variety of people who are likely not here legally on a regular basis since I live in an agricultural state where a large population of workers is of questionable immigration status.

So, what’s wrong with a little identification?  Heck, maybe if we do have everyone carry around the papers and make it legal, we’d at least have new problems to solve.

One Comment leave one →
  1. June 11, 2013 9:27 am

    I’ve been pondering immigration law a lot for the last few years, and while very conservative in most respects, I’ve come to feel that immigration quotas are wrong. I’m all for controlling access to our borders to prevent invasion from foreign forces. But if someone wants to come to the US, I say let them. If they break a law, then deport them. But I would be in favor of easy permanently renewable visas. For the first fifty years of our nation immigration was a function of buying a ticket and coming across the ocean. I feel it should be the same now (which doesn’t mean to me that you become a citizen without training and swearing a oath of allegiance to the nation you are becoming a citizen of).

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: